Staying at a job that isn’t giving you satisfaction seems counterintuitive but a lot of people would still want to maintain the job for a while because they wouldn’t want to appear unserious to employers in their resumé.
Would you stay at a bad job because you don’t your don’t want it to look bad on your resumé that you left a job too early?
Share
I’m sure many people will advice that if the job is pulling you down, it doesn’t matter if you have been there for a couple of weeks or decades. When your gut tells you to get out, get out!
As an employer, if I see a CV with lots of periods of employment less than two years, I get concerned. Getting a job and leaving a short time later is fine to do once, but you shouldn’t make a habit out of it. Employers will be concerned that either there is something wrong with you that means new jobs never work out for you or you lack the focus to stick with a job and probably won’t stay long with them either.
It really depends on your prior work history. I have a history of fairly long duration at companies (5 years or more) so I could probably get away with changing from one within a couple of months if I found it didn’t fit.
I have a friend whose daughter at one point though quit jobs every three or four months, mostly because she apparently didn’t like being told what to do. After 5 or 6 of these short term jobs, she ended up unemployed for several months because employers didn’t trust her to stick around. While she did eventually find something and stuck it out for a couple of years this time, she had a harder time than she would have had she not job hopped.
So there’s no real minimum, just don’t do short term often enough to make employers think you’re flaky.