There is so much to unpack, as the less privileged are always of the opinion that the privileged should be committed to helping them out of their misery.
Why do the less privileged always think other people are obligated to help them?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people's questions, and connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
There is so much to unpack, as the less privileged are always of the opinion that the privileged should be committed to helping them out of their misery.
The problem is, we do not even know if they are less fortunate than us or if they were fortunate and blew it. Just because someone is poor doesn’t mean they weren’t fortunate. I met a man just out of prison living in a half way house. He explained he stole a car because the other man had one and he didn’t. Cop pulled him over so he shot him did 17 years in prison. Is he unfortunate, do I owe him anything? He explained it like he did the reasonable thing not sorry for the injured cop. Judging who was less fortunate is hard unless they are family so you know the history of the person and how they got to be poor.
I strongly think an individual’s ability to attain wealth can be undermined by disadvantages faced from birth. Whether you’re born into advantage or disadvantage is simply a matter of luck. It’s absurd to argue that Person A deserved to be born into a comfortable, stable household, and that Person B deserved to be born into an impoverished, abusive household. Given that Person A and Person B will both be fundamentally shaped by the circumstances of their birth, it is our responsibility as a society to take action to compensate Person B’s disadvantage — for their sake, and for the sake of their children. To some extent, states already do this. Money is deducted from the incomes of the self-sufficient and redistributed to those who are unable to support themselves in the form of welfare. Taxpayer money is also allocated toward the public healthcare system and the construction of social housing. These measures level the playing field to a large extent, but do not achieve full equality of opportunity.
So yes, we might be obligated to help the poor, because when you dig beneath the surface you’ll often find that ‘poor people’ haven’t done much to deserve their misfortune.