Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people's questions, and connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Hair on male legs is seen as normal but on females, disgusting. Why is this?
It should not be considered disgusting. Actually, I live in one of those countries where previously the communism was the ruling system and I was told by people who were young in that system, that there were much different beauty ideals in communism than they are now. It included not shaving for womRead more
It should not be considered disgusting. Actually, I live in one of those countries where previously the communism was the ruling system and I was told by people who were young in that system, that there were much different beauty ideals in communism than they are now. It included not shaving for women, so all women went out with natural, hairy legs and it was considered a norm. Similarly, they didnt shave armpits, not to mention the intim areas. Actually, shaved legs and shaved other parts of female body were considered abnormal. As for today, it is considered less pretty if a woman doesnt shave, because today we have a totally different culture and system as well.
See less